Skip to main content

Quick Play Thru: Washington's Crossing

Being a man who likes diversity I bought / pre-ordered 4 games for Christmas about dudes in flashy coats with muskets marching around road networks. I’ve already Quick looked at Nappys Nemesis 1813, Metz is yet to be released from P500, Autumn of Glory is on the shelf, so this weekend I have played Washington’s Crossing.





The Patriot opening more or less followed the script. Washington moved with his stack, crossed the Delaware with decent movement and ferry rolls and come morning was sat just outside Trenton next to Rall’s Hessian garrison. The American gets a rather scripted +5 to surprise rolls when attacking Trenton, plus it being dawn and a prepared attack gave Washington very favourable odds but the roll was terrible and Rall escaped with only 25% losses and a retreat.

Further south Greene collected a few detachments of militia and drove the other Hessian garrisons north.




The Hessians forced marched out wide forcing Washington to either hunt them down for a few extra vps, or look elsewhere. The logical choice seemed to be a drive on Amboy and Brunswick where the rather inept and inactive Grant was sitting with 3000 men.

After a failed attempt to cut off Von Donop’s and his Hessian’s retreat Washington entrained Sullivan within his command radius and the two swallowed all the American activation points marching north.


Grant and Matthew were drawn away from Brunswick in an attempt to relieve Von Donop. However this allowed the Americans with their better movement table column and night march bonuses to slip around them positioning themselves between the main British force and the American vp hexes of Brunswick and Amboy.


Washington took Amboy by storm and Sullivan held Brunswick picking up 2vps + 2 for fighting between them. Unfortunately Cornwallis arrived with fresh British detachments. Sullivan having strayed from Washington became surrounded. Washington rushed a failed relief attack to no avail leaving Sullivan and his 800 militia to surrender whilst he retreated and then night marched in an arc around the British.




In the meantime the British had been banking unspent activation points. With more activation points the more moves. The reorganised Hessian and British forces further south reoccupied both Trenton and Bordentown claiming 6 vps across three days.

Washington force marched back down to Trenton, used the +5 surprise attack bonus for Trenton to inflict a major defeat on Leslie’s light infantry and Hessians and then re-crossed the Delaware. Simultaneously Cornwallis compensated for his slower march rates with the stock pile of British activation points to march twice a turn chasing down Washington.



Cornwalis caught Washington on the banks of the Delaware opposite Burlington but was only able to cause minor losses. Even so, by reoccupying Trenton for the third time and retaining Borden town the British finished 3 vps ahead of the Americans, despite several significant military losses.




A few thoughts on strategy. For the Americans you really need to prevent the British from retaking their outposts at Princetown and Bordentown etc. Trenton itself is a bit of a honey trap. Taking Amboy is probably a fools errand as the British reinforcements come in here and you only get 1 vp per turn for holding it. With hindsight they should have focused on hunting down the remaining Hessians and finishing them off before looking for targets of opportunity against the British main force. For the British running away with the Hessians is a good idea. You probably are not going to catch Washington, so rather taking out the other forces and reoccupying the outposts should be the goal.

In its favour this is a really open situation that gives both players a lot of options with how to spend their very limited number of activations points and which way to march. In the negative column is the book keeping system. For some reason the game tracks troop totals for each leader down to the 10s. So you have to track 10s, 100s, 1000s for each unit and then total them up and do percentages for battles and vp calculations. It’s workable but this game came out in 2012. I approve of a clean uncluttered map but about a third of the rules and book keeping could be cut from this game with little loss in detail.




Despite the interface I prefer this to 1812. Along with Stonewall Jacksons way this is one of the better dudes in coats marching around a map games I’ve played. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Quick Looks: Cimean War Battles - Tchernaya River

 A quick one today I traded off Across the Narva by Revolution Games (should post something on this) for an oldish (2000) copy of an S&T magazine. The mag came with two battles reprinted from the 1978 Quad game on the Crimean War. The full Quad also contained Inkerman and Balaklava, this magazine version just has Tchernaya River and Alma. Initial setup Early SPI games (and actually GDW and AH come to think of it) of the 70s tend to have lots of rules you already know. I go, U go, movement, fire, melee, rally, and most of the rules are standard. Command and control rules and friction of war arrived a lot later. To couter this I have added a simple house rule. For each division (units are brigates and regiments, about 2-8 per division) roll. On a 1 in 6 movement is halved unless the unit can charge, in which case it must charge the nearest enemy.  A simple easy to apply rule for generating those light brigade charges. You could also easily convert this to a chit pull game by division

Quick Looks; Red Star / White Eagle

I generally hate it when people describe designs or ideas in games as dated, because many of the most innovative games  are older than I am. Equally it implies there is something innately good about new designs, which I don't think there is. Dune is arguably the best multiplayer 'war' boardgame and the 70s basic DnD is in my view still the best RPG. I wasn't born until the late 80s and didn't discover these things to the mid 2000s so this isn't nostalgia doing my thinking, its just that some old ideas are better than new ones, despite our apparent 'progress'. Back when Roger B MacGowan did cool art house covers But having said all this Red Star / White Eagle is a dated game design. And this matters if you are looking at popping £70 on a new reprint of it from Compass Games. I am a wary cheapskate so I picked up a second hand copy with a trashed box of ebay for £20. It was worth it, but only just. Poles have just been creamed on the south we

Wilderness War is probably the best CDG (review)

One attribute of a good war game is that it opens up rather than narrows down the more you play it. Each time you play you see there is more strategic depth than you thought there was. When I first started playing Wilderness War, a card driven wargame design (CDG) on the French Indian War by Volko Runke, I thought it was simply a case of the British building a large kill stack and marching it up the Hudson and the French trying to get enough victory points (vps) from raiding to win before the inevitable. The outcome would likely be decided by card play and who got the reinforcement cards when they needed them. The game is afoot.  Four games later I have realised that this is not the case. Yes the British will sometimes win by marching a big army up the Hudson and sieging out Montreal, but a lot of the time things will play out quite differently. Maybe the French strike first, perhaps the British realise that going up the Hudson is going to be a slog try another route. Ei