Skip to main content

A weekend of Wargaming Part 2: Urban Operations, A Quick Look

This game was originally developed as a training tool for French infantry officers and this shows through. The game is unforgiving of mistakes and seems to revolve around teaching you the by the book methods for assaulting strong points or clearing streets.  In Grozny I had to clear out about 12 Chechen rebel squads/sniper teams. The game gave me three platoons of infantry, two Shilkas, two T80s, some snipers, combat engineers and some off map rocket artillery and hello strikes. This is enough tools to do the job, but you are expected to know how to use each tool properly. For my part, the huge defensive bonus provided by the strong points proved costly to overcome.

 
Russians activated, moving on Chechen strong point



In practice I did not know how to use these tools, or at least not for the first half of the game, later I did sort of start to figure things out, but only after the loss of one T80, the best part of a platoon and all my spetznaz and sniper teams.  


This is a heavy game with a horrible rule book. It’s not necessarily full of errors but the writer loves needless acronyms (a hex is an EP) making it hard to pass and some items such as the combat player aids don’t seem to quite match the written rules. I know we missed a few rules from the dense 30 odd pages in our game but the struggle is not insurmountable, I think after 3-4 games and a couple of forum browses you should be set.

An RPG from the roof scores a critical on my T80, my Shilka fails to provide covering fire.


It’s a block game. My feeling at this stage is that the blocks add more of an ambiguity than a fog of war simulation. Combat is fairly deterministic, unless one side rolls a 9 in which case they win a fire fight regardless, but most of the time if your weapon system rates more than 4 over your opponents you’re going to win and inflict a hit. As such there is a benefit to scouting the target block identifying its weapon systems and condition. Most of the time however you are two far away for this option so you just shoot anyway. Block games boast a fog of war, but this doesn’t quite work here. There is nothing to stop you calling in a rocket battery on a building because it has blocks in it, even if you have never had any contact. On the other hand the game often gives the defender a plethora of face down trap counters and allows them to choose the underground map connections.

My Spetznaz reach the park


The main draw here is the variety of mil-tech in the box. Incendiary rocket launchers, mid angle armour on T80s spetznaz with dummy counters, this is a box of horrible toys for setting fire to your opponent’s blocks. And if you get good at it you might learn something out modern urban combat tactics. It has two campaigns, 1990s in Mogadishu, and 1985 Fulda Gap and a set of four individual scenarios. There are not many non-magazine games that cover conflicts such as Chechnya, or the French Foreign Legion in Zaire. I cautiously recommend this game. Its top of my list of games to play with Pete, as I like the settings and narratives it tells. I worry that it might be a bit too puzzle like down the stretch, once you have discovered the method it could be a case of getting the die rolls.

Comments

  1. BAOR campaign next or shall we head to the Mog'?

    Cheers,

    Pete.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quick Looks: Cimean War Battles - Tchernaya River

 A quick one today I traded off Across the Narva by Revolution Games (should post something on this) for an oldish (2000) copy of an S&T magazine. The mag came with two battles reprinted from the 1978 Quad game on the Crimean War. The full Quad also contained Inkerman and Balaklava, this magazine version just has Tchernaya River and Alma. Initial setup Early SPI games (and actually GDW and AH come to think of it) of the 70s tend to have lots of rules you already know. I go, U go, movement, fire, melee, rally, and most of the rules are standard. Command and control rules and friction of war arrived a lot later. To couter this I have added a simple house rule. For each division (units are brigates and regiments, about 2-8 per division) roll. On a 1 in 6 movement is halved unless the unit can charge, in which case it must charge the nearest enemy.  A simple easy to apply rule for generating those light brigade charges. You could also easily convert this to a chit pull game by division

Quick Looks; Red Star / White Eagle

I generally hate it when people describe designs or ideas in games as dated, because many of the most innovative games  are older than I am. Equally it implies there is something innately good about new designs, which I don't think there is. Dune is arguably the best multiplayer 'war' boardgame and the 70s basic DnD is in my view still the best RPG. I wasn't born until the late 80s and didn't discover these things to the mid 2000s so this isn't nostalgia doing my thinking, its just that some old ideas are better than new ones, despite our apparent 'progress'. Back when Roger B MacGowan did cool art house covers But having said all this Red Star / White Eagle is a dated game design. And this matters if you are looking at popping £70 on a new reprint of it from Compass Games. I am a wary cheapskate so I picked up a second hand copy with a trashed box of ebay for £20. It was worth it, but only just. Poles have just been creamed on the south we

Wilderness War is probably the best CDG (review)

One attribute of a good war game is that it opens up rather than narrows down the more you play it. Each time you play you see there is more strategic depth than you thought there was. When I first started playing Wilderness War, a card driven wargame design (CDG) on the French Indian War by Volko Runke, I thought it was simply a case of the British building a large kill stack and marching it up the Hudson and the French trying to get enough victory points (vps) from raiding to win before the inevitable. The outcome would likely be decided by card play and who got the reinforcement cards when they needed them. The game is afoot.  Four games later I have realised that this is not the case. Yes the British will sometimes win by marching a big army up the Hudson and sieging out Montreal, but a lot of the time things will play out quite differently. Maybe the French strike first, perhaps the British realise that going up the Hudson is going to be a slog try another route. Ei